MMT Knowledge is Power
Published on
Contents
Could be the most boring title I have written, but this has been bubbling for a while, I just needed to write it.
People far too often ignore dynamics. Knowledge seems static, but in the real world this is never the case. When we gain knowledge we are continually refining it, or we die. One or the other. It is a sort of mainstream Economics N3rd thing to ignore dynamics, so please do not! (Do not be a n3rd, nor be a mere economist!๐คฃ)
True, if all you had was mere knowledge then like an economist you’d be pretty useless.
My main message today is,
Knowledge is an infinite resource, once you draw upon it, it is still there. It might even be enhanced.
The issue then — to turn knowledge into power — is action. Even for the neoliberal who loves depoliticization of what should be public policy — taking the politics out of politics — inaction is a type of action. A wilfulness not to give a damn. The entire thesis of laissez faire doctrine is kind of madness in this respect. It is unconscionable for anyone with a moral conscience. That is to say, when you have political ๐ก๐ ๐จ๐๐ฃ then inaction is a form of action. Why? Because you could have chosen to do otherwise. (I believe there is such a thing as free will, though I know not from where it springs nor what it permits, I only know the quantum cosmology permitting some freedom of action in a physical world. FN-1 )
That’d be my second main point today: counterfactuals are also of huge importance, and people ignore them far too often.
Let’s then consider political ๐ก๐ ๐จ๐๐ฃ to be something that requires knowledge. If the knowledge is false the ๐ก๐ ๐จ๐๐ฃ is going to be very lively a terrible power, unjust, or good but only be sheer accident. Fn-2
Since all knowledge is power, and is infinite in resource, but is dynamic so can be updated, MMT knowledge is Power. But as I just noted, it must be accompanied by action. Or — if you already have social power — this could be inaction. You do not get an escape clause. With great power comes great responsibility.
What we do with this power matters.
What about: “With great knowledge comes…” — well this is different! If you lack the particular power to act freely, or free-enough, then with great power comes great frustration and depression, but at least I think a responsibility to teach & educate. So we all have some social power. Hence all knowledge is power. Unless you are dead or socially isolated completely isolated (an impossibility for any long period?).
Last thing then is the moral layer.
I wrote nothing yet about the good of knowledge, or the good of power. How do we make knowledge and power good?
The only reasonable answer in my view is with a moral lens. Even if you end up being wrong, you will know this and course-correct if your motives were pure good. But not necessarily if you motives were pure evil (if there is a such a thing, but let’s day “relatively evil” FN-3 ).
MMT Knowledge is Power. It can be very nasty. The bฬถeฬถsฬถtฬถ most effective MMT politicians in our times were Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. They drew on an infinite resource (the mere idea the US government debt is not operationally constrained) for absolutely no good ends. That mere idea, that knowledge (which was true) never depleted whenever they used it, could not be destroyed without invasive brain surgery, or the like, being performed on those old shrivelled soul dudes.
People who say “MMT is not ๐ก๐ ๐จ๐๐ฃ” are clowns.Fn-4 Remember, you cannot help but act unless you are dead, so the mere knowledge impels you to act, or not act, but in not acting you are acting. I hate to trot out a Zen line like this, but Lord help me it is true, in this context.
A blind old lady is crossing the road and about to be hit by a lorry, and you are nearby. If you choose to not act have you been morally neutral? Or have you been pretty darn evil, in some relative terms?
You could, I suppose, choose to not act upon the knowledge of MMT. But be realistic and fair in your assessment? Who is that person?
We can admit that once everyone, or some critical mass, understand MMT — or whatever the system of units of account for social obligations in your neighbourhood happens to be, maybe not MMT — then knowledge of this generalized MMT, becomes a bit trivial.FN-5 But just because it might then appear to have no effect is forgetting the second lesson: the counterfactual.
Footnotes:
| Previous post | Back to | Next post |
| Ai Copperfields | TOC | (TBD) |